![]() I worked around this by using jre8-openjdk-headless, java8-openjfx and running archlinux-java set java-8-openjdk/jre before running filebot. I think this was introduced in a very recent revision of the PKGBUILD, within the last month or so. I'm not sure which anymore because I cleared my package cache last week, but I think 4.9.1-3 still functioned as expected, because I reverted to an older version maybe 2-3 weeks ago because I was having trouble with one of the newer revisions. Open the GUI (that doesn't work), press F5 twice, and see what it says (and post it here).: This version of Filebot is using Java 11 or 14 with OpenJFXĮrror: A JNI error has occurred, please check your installation and try againĮxception in thread "main" : net/filebot/Main has been compiled by a more recent version of the Java Runtime (class file version 55.0), this version of the Java Runtime only recognizes class file versions up to 52.0Īt 1(Native Method)Īt (ClassLoader.java:756)Īt (SecureClassLoader.java:142)Īt (URLClassLoader.java:468)Īt $100(URLClassLoader.java:74)Īt $1.run(URLClassLoader.java:369)Īt $1.run(URLClassLoader.java:363)Īt (Native Method)Īt (URLClassLoader.java:362)Īt (ClassLoader.java:418)Īt $AppClassLoader.loadClass(Launcher.java:352)Īt (ClassLoader.java:351)Īt (LauncherHelper.That's what you think, but it's not actually the case, according to the error message. I will certainly try this after I install FileBot again for the 20th time.lol Until then, I will trust that FileBot told me that it was 64 bit and I also trust Java, which is reporting 64 bit through the Control Panel. Is it a clean Windows 10 Creators Update machine with all the latest updates? Really Really? Why not? Does it give you any reason? What version of Windows are you using? You just need Windows 10 with all the latest updates. NO! I am NOT WINDOWS 10! Even my logs show that I'm am Win 7. Actually, to my surprise, it shows a alsightly earlier version than 7.but I am NOT WIN 10 and I don't want to be. I just want FileBot to work as it did before the "make you pay" upgrade. I don't even mind paying, but this is a bit ridiculous. It's becoming quite circular, and if they expect me to upgrade to WIN 10 just to run this app, well, ah, no. I had this product on Win 7 and it ran just fine. I just tried to upgrade as the pop up suggested when I ran the program. ![]() I know many here are much smarter than this old guy, but this is no way to do smart business. I would have gladly paid for it, GIVEN THE INFORMATION UP FRONT! But holding customers hostage is not smart business. I'm an unhappy client, the software no longer runs, and the upgrade in Windows Store tells me that I need WIN 10. And NOBODY has a solution? Why would I pay for this?įor those trying to help, I appreciate it! but requiring WIN 10 is a huge mistake. Being backward compatible is important.Ī simple message during the pop up stating that all future versions require payment would have satisfied me. But with tech problems like this, and what seems to be less than honest marketing techniques, well, I'm not impressed with sales operations as much as I was the product. ![]() I'm just an old user looking to use what was once a great product. I just don't have any more time to waste on this board(falsely labeled TECH SUPPORT), when I can be watching my favorite shows, faithfully renamed by your still free competition. PS-if your a tech troll with nothing better to do than to hassle non tech users, may I suggest a job as a Walmart Greeter? For those who tried to help, a sincere thanks, but no solution as of yet. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |